Initially, this week we were going to write about Groundhog Day. However, with the winter storm going on right now outside of my window, I am actually happy that winter has finally shown her face. Enough of the one or two inches of snow, I am totally pleased to get a full-fledged blizzard on Super Bowl Sunday. So rather than pondering the truth about Groundhog Day (I did attach the article to the image on the right just in case you are curious), we are going to try and wrap our head around the gap between what scientists and regular folks like you and me believe.
Recent outbreaks of measles have been tied to children who haven't been vaccinated. Many people still believe that childhood vaccinations are dangerous, despite scientific evidence to the contrary.
From:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2015/01/150129-public-opinion-aaas-health-education-science/
Last week,
National Geographic published the article above about differences in opinion between scientists and the "regular Joe." For this week you will first read the article above. Then, take a look at the graphic below:
The article states that both scientists and U.S. adults agree about the space station, but other than that the gap is enormous. If scientists say that childhood vaccinations are safe and should be required, why don't people believe them? Are you in favor of vaccinations? Do you know people that do not vaccinate their kids? If more children were vaccinated, would California be experiences an outbreak of the measles? If scientists have evidence to prove that climate change is the result of human activity, then why can't we accept the responsibility to fix the problem we created? Finally, as you are sitting down to enjoy your Super Bowl snacks, why do most people avoid genetically modified foods? What is causing the disconnect? Why are U.S. adults so hesitant to believe scientists? What do you think? What about the other issues?
After reading the article, you will write a scholarly response to the questions that I posed above. If you feel strongly about a specific topic or issue in the article, then feel free to focus on that issue. I expect a quality paragraph and evidence to support your claims. Additionally, you need to respond to at least one of your peers.